The government on Thursday cleared Swedish home furnishing major IKEA’s Rs 10,500-crore investment proposal, the biggest investment in single-brand retail sector after the government liberalised policy in November 2011.
IKEA, which has already been sourcing products from India over the last 25 years, initially plans to set up 10 furnishing and homeware stores over a period of ten years. Commerce and industry minister Anand Sharma called the decision a ‘historic’ one.
“This will be the biggest foreign investment in the retail segment till now and will provide an opportunity to Indian small and medium enterprises in a wide range of labour intensive sectors for integrating into global value chain,” he said in a statement after the cabinet committee on economic affairs (CCEA) cleared the proposal.
The proposal had already been cleared by the foreign investment promotion board (FIPB) but since it involved investment of over Rs 1,200 crore it had to also be vetted by the CCEA. “The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs today gave its approval to the proposal of M/s. Ingka Holding B.V., Netherlands, as recommended by the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB),” government said in a statement.
Ingka is a IKEA Group company.
“We feel very welcome in India. This is a big step in our journey to open IKEA stores in India. We feel very confident that the people of India will love to visit and to shop at IKEA,” IKEA India Chief Executive Officer Juvencio Maeztu said in a statement. The company will offer “good quality home furnishing products and solutions at affordable prices,” Maeztu added.
“This is a very positive development. Since many years already, India is an important market for the IKEA Group from a sourcing perspective,” IKEA Group President and CEO Mikael Ohlsson said:.
Sources told ET that government has stuck to the condition that sourcing done by IKEA for its global operations cannot be counted towards the 30% mandatory sourcing under single brand retail policy. The department of industrial policy and promotion (DIPP) had in its note to the CCEA said that IKEA must operate two separate entities in India – one for pure retailing and other for sourcing of products that to be sold only in India by the single brand retail firm.
Global retailers keen to set up fully owned ventures have been lobbying the government to consider their exports out of India for their global operations towards the 30% local sourcing under the policy.
However, IKEA has been allowed to run cafes and restaurants within its single brand stores in India, but it cannot sell packed food items.
Government had modified many clauses of the single-brand policy that it notified in January 2012 after IKEA raised concerns over sourcing and brand ownership issues. The original policy said that the mandatory 30% sourcing had to be from small and medium enterprises, which was later diluted at the instance of IKEA to preferably from small business.
IKEA had also expressed its reservations on the restrictions imposed by FIPB after it cleared the proposal in November 2012, forcing DIPP to move a modified proposal. The FIPB cleared the proposal a second time in January 2013.
Connect With Us
Related Posts
- Real Estate Act comes into effect: 10 things you need to know about new law ( May 4, 2017 )
- Expats Living in Comfort – Hyderabad, India ( May 4, 2017 )
- MNC queue to Hyderabad grows longer; JP Morgan & IBM look for office space ( June 22, 2016 )
- An Apple in Hyderabad’s IT Garden: CEO Tim Cook’s big announcement Today ( May 19, 2016 )
- Hyderabad May get Disneyland Park ( April 22, 2016 )
- Indian Office Space Absorption Up 11% in Q4: Survey ( April 13, 2016 )
- Cognizant plans to add 8,000 people at Hyderabad facility ( March 9, 2016 )
- Ranked 139 in world, Hyderabad is Best Indian City to Live in ( February 24, 2016 )
- The Platina – Exclusive Commercial Space, Hyderabad ( February 19, 2016 )
- Apple, Inc set to open new $25 million Tech Center in Hyderabad, India by June ( February 16, 2016 )
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2018
- October 2017
- May 2017
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
Leave a reply