Corporate India has urged Finance Minister Arun Jaitley to exempt special economic zones (SEZ) developers and units from the levy of minimum alternate tax (MAT).
After being unable to get their way in recent years for removal of this levy, India Inc is once again making efforts to get this duty out of the income tax law in respect of SEZ developers and units.
A regime change at the Centre and new guard at the Finance Ministry has raised hopes among SEZ developers that the MAT levy would go in the upcoming budget.
“We have requested that MAT be totally removed for SEZ developers and units. For others, our suggestion is that the MAT rate should be scaled down to say 10 per cent,” said a senior industry representative who attended the pre-Budget meeting with Jaitley recently. This demand is seen as a big ask on Jaitley who may not deliver a populist Budget given the fiscal situation.
MAT HISTORY ON SEZs
The Government had in Budget 2011-12 imposed MAT of 18.5 per cent on SEZ developers and units.
This levy had come into effect on April 1, 2012, (from financial year 2011-12) amid protest from SEZ developers and units. The current MAT rate is 20.96 per cent and is applicable on book profits.
WHAT IS MAT?
Under the income-tax law, if a company’s taxable income is less than a certain percentage of the booked profits, then by default that much of the book profits will be considered as taxable income and tax has to be paid on that. Currently, the basis of levy of MAT is on ‘book profits’. However, the proposed direct taxes code wants to change the basis of levy to ‘gross assets’ instead of ‘book profits’.
INDUSTRY DEMANDS
The upcoming Budget should allow the aggregate of book loss and unabsorbed depreciation to be reduced while computing book profits, some industry associations have suggested.
They also want the weighted deduction available for research and development expenditure to be counted for computing book profit for MAT purposes.
Also, the long-term capital gain in respect of equity shares in a company or units of equity-oriented funds on which securities transaction tax (STT) has been paid should not be part of book profit for the levy of MAT, industry has suggested.
Via : BusinessLine
Connect With Us
Related Posts
- Real Estate Act comes into effect: 10 things you need to know about new law ( May 4, 2017 )
- Expats Living in Comfort – Hyderabad, India ( May 4, 2017 )
- MNC queue to Hyderabad grows longer; JP Morgan & IBM look for office space ( June 22, 2016 )
- An Apple in Hyderabad’s IT Garden: CEO Tim Cook’s big announcement Today ( May 19, 2016 )
- Hyderabad May get Disneyland Park ( April 22, 2016 )
- Indian Office Space Absorption Up 11% in Q4: Survey ( April 13, 2016 )
- Cognizant plans to add 8,000 people at Hyderabad facility ( March 9, 2016 )
- Ranked 139 in world, Hyderabad is Best Indian City to Live in ( February 24, 2016 )
- The Platina – Exclusive Commercial Space, Hyderabad ( February 19, 2016 )
- Apple, Inc set to open new $25 million Tech Center in Hyderabad, India by June ( February 16, 2016 )
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2018
- October 2017
- May 2017
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
Leave a reply